|
|
Posted By Adriana Vargas, National Fenestration Rating Council,
Thursday, March 18, 2021
|
Women’s voices are not often heard in executive suites or in boardrooms but bring tremendous value to the opinions and decision-making for organizations. This greater diversity of viewpoints improves board discussions because different perspectives can bring more information to the table. In addition, a person in the executive suite gains insight and skills for dealing with board members by serving on the boards of other organizations. At NFRC, the organization that rates the energy performance of windows, doors, and skylights, they have women in the executive office and serving on its board. And, in her free time, NFRC’s Chief Executive Officer Deb Callahan volunteers as an Association Board member at her alma mater Wells College and serves on other charitable organizations’ boards of directors. Serving on a nonprofit board and sharing your professional knowledge, energy, and expertise not only benefits the organization but also you as well, especially women. Research has found that female directors tend to be less conformist and more likely to express their independent views than male directors because they’re not part of old-boy networks. Through her board experience, Callahan said she believes she’s has built a better relationship with NFRC’s own board of directors. The time she spends on nonprofit boards while being the CEO of NFRC is what enables her to be successful in both roles, Callahan said. Often leaders of organizations don’t take the time to serve on boards or see the value of board service to their leadership development. Callahan uses her experience as a board member to refine her approach to relationship-building and communication with NFRC’s board. “To have a really effective engagement with your board as a CEO, you’ve got to understand where they are coming from and they have to understand where you’re coming from. That can be challenging if you don’t have the benefit of serving in both of those roles, but most don’t,” Callahan said. “Most folks who are CEOs don’t serve on a board and I think if there’s the opportunity to do that, you absolutely need to put yourself out there and do it.” In addition to understanding the board’s perspective, Callahan said that communicating the challenges she faces and areas where she’s focusing reassures the board that she is a good steward of the organization. These efforts develop an understanding and an appreciation of the roles as CEO and board member. Through that journey together, they create a well-functioning, dynamic partnership. “I’ve taken that experience and actually, now that I sit on a nonprofit board, try and look at what that organization is doing. I look at the work that we’re doing, and I look at it through two lenses, that as a CEO and then that as a board member. It’s really neat.”

Tags:
board of directors
fenestration
leadership
organizations
research
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Adriana Vargas, National Fenestration Rating Council,
Friday, February 26, 2021
Updated: Tuesday, March 2, 2021
|
Author by: Lyndsay
Suchanek
Reynaers Aluminium develops and markets innovative and sustainable aluminum used in windows, doors, curtain walls, and sliding doors for both commercial and residential buildings. Reynaers is headquartered in Duffel, Belgium, with a U.S. location in Phoenix. Driven by energy, efficiency, and a willingness to take responsibility for the environment, we have selected the United Nation’s Sustainable Development Themes most relevant to our business: material use, energy, and health and safety. Reducing our impact on the environment and improving the legacy that we create is an essential part of our business strategy. Aluminum is a strong, light, and highly durable material that is 100 percent recyclable without loss of characteristics. Recycling consumes 95 percent less energy compared to producing primary aluminum; each ton of recycled aluminum avoids 9 tons of CO2 emissions. By working closely with our suppliers, Reynaers Aluminium can offer window and door frames with an average of 54 percent recycled aluminum, saving 58,000 tons of CO2.
Reynaers Aluminium analyzes the processes used in order to minimize waste. The most prevalent is the cut optimization in Reynapro, our software used to automate production. This means that our materials are cut to the exact length needed every time without any human error. Reynaers is involved in two packaging improvement projects: one for incoming aluminum profiles (started in 2019) and one for hardware (planned for 2021). Furthermore, the Reynaers facility in the U.S. reuses the packaging from Belgium that the materials arrive in when shipping the finished products.
Reynaers also invests in the certification of our systems. A Cradle2Cradle certificate is available for our most popular systems, signifying our products are designed with a positive impact on people and planet. Additionally, an increasing number of Environmental Product Declarations (EPD) are available. The EPDs cover the environmental impacts throughout the product life cycle and allow for efficiency during the design process. As of 2021, fourteen EPDs have been developed for our various windows, doors, curtain walls, and sliding systems.
Energy is a large component of sustainable solutions. Reynaers Aluminium combats global warming with our energy-efficient products and systems that make buildings more energy efficient. Our products increase insulation and airtightness to reduce heat loss. The Passive House component is a widely-known certificate to prove the energy efficiency of windows and doors, and we have multiple products that meet those high requirements. Also, all of the products that we offer in the U.S. are tested and certified per NFRC requirements.
Globally, buildings are responsible for a large share of energy, electricity, water, and materials consumption. The building sector has the greatest potential to deliver significant cuts in emissions at little or no cost. Existing buildings are responsible for more than 40 percent of the total primary energy consumption and 24 percent of global carbon dioxide emissions. We help buildings achieve various sustainable building certifications such as the Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method or BREEAM, the U.S. Green Building Council’s LEED, and the International Well Building Institute’s WELL. Our products are specifically designed for a long lifespan with low maintenance; aluminum is not affected by UV rays or moisture and doesn’t corrode or rot. Moreover, we use high-quality surface treatment on our profiles: powder coat or anodization. Powder coating is preferable over wet painting because there are no solvents or Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) – meaning there is no damage to the environment. Ultimately, powder coat is not hazardous to its surroundings or the health of people who work with it. Also, it can be gathered and reused, which increases its eco-friendliness.
Along with the material and energy, Reynaers also focuses on the safety and health of people. We guarantee a maximum safety level of buildings and promote safe working conditions for our employees. Reynaers continues to develop safety solutions for our products: earthquake resistance, bomb blast, and hurricane proof. For our employees, we focus on accident-free days, an ergonomic work environment, safety training, and the provision of personal protective equipment.
Reynaers Aluminium’s mission is to “increase the value of buildings and to enhance the living and working environment of people worldwide. We achieve this together with our partners by providing innovative and sustainable aluminum solutions for the building envelope.” In short, sustainability is at the core of our company. We look at sustainability wholistically, combining the focus on material use, safety and health, and energy, while also sharing our knowledge and supporting other’s sustainable building projects.
Tags:
buildings
energy efficiency
environment
green building
recycle
sustainability
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Adriana Vargas, National Fenestration Rating Council,
Tuesday, February 16, 2021
|
It was June 2003, and the newly installed chief building official of Parker, Colo., stood before a room of builders to deliver a message he knew they wouldn’t like. But Gil Rossmiller also knew they’d come around. He had a plan for energy efficiency, and wouldn’t need much money to make it happen. Rossmiller wanted them to think differently about buildings – as a system of integrated pieces, that interact with each other, and would do it best if designed in a specific sequence. He cited an example: when builders design air-conditioning systems without first picking the windows and calculating a building’s thermal envelope, they’re doing it wrong. He knew they could boost energy efficiency, add comfort, and save money. Rossmiller went on to private consulting, currently with Shums Coda Associates, but left Parker, a Denver suburb of 55,000, with a method to ensure efficient energy use in buildings and a group of local builders who support it. “We took logical steps, integrated them with existing processes, and learned together with our builders,” Rossmiller said. “Energy code enforcement is now just a part of the process like any other building code.” These are steps most American municipalities have yet to take, he said – energy codes aren’t as well understood and complied with as other parts of the International Code Council’s International Building Code (IBC). For windows, doors, and skylights, also known as fenestration products, that’s in part because of an assumption that an energy-performance label from the National Fenestration Ratings Council (NFRC) affixed to a newly installed window is typically all that’s required for compliance. But the reality is that energy efficiency requires early planning at the design phase. And whilst leaders work toward top-down solutions for compliance, that’s not the only way to drive efficiency– consumers demand it. Efficiency isn’t just a best-practice ideal. It’s also good for business. Rossmiller first understood that when he was a builder himself. After working in construction, and then as a private-sector building inspector for a company providing that service to municipalities, he worked in the 2000s as a systems-improvement manager for a local builder struggling with moisture issues in its houses. “We came look at a house as a system, and that you can’t change one thing in the system without impacting other parts of it,” he said. Fenestration was central to the challenge for compliance. Rossmiller and colleagues realized they were designing HVAC systems too early in the process. By committing to first calculating a house’s overall thermal envelope, including the fenestration factor, they realized that they could cut HVAC capacity by half, and that solved the moisture problem. “Customer callbacks for comfort issues practically disappeared,” Rossmiller said. He took these lessons with him when he became Parker’s chief – and only -- building official in 2003. He aimed to boost efficiency through a greater awareness of and compliance with the International Energy Conservation Code, one element of the IBC. Rossmiller convened builders working in Parker for training sessions given for free by product suppliers, for goods such as house wrap and insulation. Together, he and builders learned more about defining a building’s thermal envelope, such as considering whether crawlspaces, attics, and HVAC ductwork would be placed inside or outside that envelope. They then moved on to other elements of the building process, and Rossmiller gave buildings time for adaptation before enforcement. By 2006, most of those builders were producing houses at least 15 percent more efficient, and often qualifying for ENERGY STAR® status. “They resisted at first, but many later told me they’ll never go back to the old ways,” Rossmiller said. Municipalities that follow the international family of building codes, and make clear that what will be inspected, will eventually find that training and inspection becomes less necessary over time. Targeting efficiency is increasingly easy, Rossmiller said, given the natural improvements vendors make to their windows, doors, house wrap, and other materials. And code inspectors today have more tools, especially on-site. When Rossmiller was a young code inspector, he’d have to do longhand math on paper during inspections and didn’t have a smartphone available to look up code specifics. This combination of improved products and readily-available technical information should help today’s young building inspectors to better understand what they see in the field, and also create an opportunity to simplify and clarify the building codes themselves. KEY TAKEAWAYS -Building energy-efficient buildings means following a sequence. For fenestration, it’s important to remember that picking products and calculating a building’s thermal envelope comes before designing an HVAC system.
-Using building codes to drive efficiency is a slow process of small steps, at least in early stages, to establish widespread support
-Municipal building departments should have an energy-code champion, to serve as a knowledge base and support for staff and contractors. That person should develop a timeline for compliance, and ensure that both staff and contractors are on the same page before taking a next step. |

Tags:
building code
code enforcement
Compliance
construction
energy efficiency
fenestration
green building
HVAC
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Adriana Vargas, National Fenestration Rating Council,
Tuesday, February 2, 2021
|
Duane Jonlin is Seattle’s Energy Code Advisor, and his job is to push change on a building industry famously resistant to anything that even smells like it. Jonlin’s a winner in almost all these building-code battles thanks to a not-so-secret weapon: he works for politicians who believe in energy efficiency. “Across the country the energy code is a flashpoint that draws intense antagonism,” Jonlin said. “But if you have top-down support, you can use it to drive innovation.” It’s important to consider windows, doors, and skylights because good choices in new structures make efficient energy use possible, Jonlin said. Efficiency is important, he said, because it is increasingly the cheapest and least-risky way to meet future growth in demand for power in his part of the country – Jonlin cited a forecasting exercise from the Northwest Power and Conservation Council, a regional energy-planning body for Idaho, Montana, Oregon, and Washington, which considered numerous future scenarios, and found that in 90 percent of them, there would be no need to build new power plants for a decade if efficiency measures were used instead. The report found in more than 50 percent of situations an efficiency drive would mean no new power plants required to 2040. Jonlin’s political bosses are convinced too. One example of Seattle’s commitment to efficiency, Jonlin says, is that the city requires windows and glass for storefronts and the exteriors of high-rise buildings to be rated by the National Fenestration Rating Council (NFRC) and enforces this requirement. At the state level, Washington passed a law in 2009 mandating that by the year 2030 new buildings offer an energy savings of 70 percent compared with 2006 levels. The law mandates that standards improve gradually with every update to Seattle’s and Washington’s building codes, to ensure steady progress toward the 2030 deadline. As more states, cities, and communities enact emissions’ reduction targets, the sense of possibility Jonlin enjoys will go from notable to normal, and his experience will become more relevant for code officials across the country. Washington’s state legislature enacted its efficiency law in response to the American Institute of Architects’ Architecture 2030 challenge, which according to the Architecture 2030 website, only California and Washington have adopted as mandatory for all buildings. Some states have made it voluntary, but Jonlin said that’s not enough. “People say you just need the right way to encourage the construction industry, but that’s a happy fantasy,” Jonlin said. “The market can adjust and innovate, but it only happens on that magical level when it’s absolutely required.” When he meets resistance, Jonlin said he reminds product manufacturers and builders that he’s merely enforcing a law. And, often enough, he’s rewarded with innovation. In the last few code updates, he said, he’s pushed to make windows more efficient by boosting the standard for how much heat they must block from escaping a building’s interior. He thought he could trigger a move from double-pane windows to triple-pane ones, which insulate better but are more expensive to install because they are thicker. But it hasn’t happened. “The industry just keeps innovating better double-paned glass.” Examples of that new technology include ``thin triples,’’ which were developed together with the U.S. Department of Energy’s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. They feature a thin layer of glass similar to the material used for computer screens between the two panes. That avoids the thickness problem. In large spaces such as airports and skyscraper lobbies, using thin triples eliminates the need for heating along the perimeter. The knowledge that innovation replaces resistance is something Jonlin said he learned from his old boss and mentor, John Hogan, who 20 years ago mandated all new windows have a low-emissions coating on them that blocks heat from entering homes without also blocking natural light. “Builders reacted like the world was going to end,” Jonlin recalled. “But instead they adjusted, and we got better buildings.” KEY TAKEAWAYS -Energy efficiency can be a cheaper, faster and less risky way to meet future demand for electricity -Making efficiency measures mandatory instead of voluntary speeds up the pace of innovation -Pushing standards higher in Seattle led to better window products without boosting installation costs |

Tags:
buildings
energy efficiency
energy planning
fenestration
glass
innovation
NFRC
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Adriana Vargas, National Fenestration Rating Council,
Monday, February 1, 2021
Updated: Tuesday, February 2, 2021
|
The fenestration community was saddened to learn of the passing of William Churchman du Pont, 64, on Dec. 29, 2020. Willie, as he was known to friends, family, and colleagues, was an early innovator in the fenestration industry and served as the first technical director for NFRC in the early 1990s. Willie is credited with training the first class of NFRC certified simulators. Additionally, he helped develop NFRC’s process to test and rate the thermal performance of windows, doors, and skylights, which is still used today. According to Jeff Baker, former NFRC Board chairman and NFRC Board ombudsman, Willie was instrumental in setting the direction for NFRC when the organization was founded more than 30 years ago. He helped to shape and improve numerous standards and methods. “He was also a kindhearted person who would help anybody out, whether professionally or personally,” Baker said. “He had so many connections within the business of fenestration and Willie helped navigate NFRC in those early years.” News of Willie’s passing elicited strong sentiments from those who knew him and of his involvement within NFRC. He was described as a kind and gentle soul who always sought to give 100 percent to his projects and efforts. “I always admired Willie’s passion for window energy performance,” said Paul Bush of Vitro Glass and former NFRC board chair. Several NFRC members had relationships with Willie beyond fenestration and often joined him sailing on his family’s custom-built 45-foot sloop “Waupi,” which he sailed out of Annapolis, MD. When Willie left NFRC, he become a consultant and conducted research for the organization while continuing to work closely in areas related to fenestration and energy efficiency. Willie was a graduate of St. George’s School in Newport RI, Marlboro College in Marlboro, VT, and Arizona State University in Tempe, where he received a master’s degree in Environmental Science. He died of natural causes, according to the published obituary. There will be a memorial service at the family cemetery in Montchanin, DE, at a time yet to be announced. 
Willie du Pont of Sunergy Consulting discussed the Window 6/Therm 6 Validation research project at the NFRC Fall Membership Meeting in Jacksonville, FL., in November 2008.
Tags:
fenestration
innovator
research
thermal
Permalink
| Comments (2)
|
|
|
Posted By Adriana Vargas, National Fenestration Rating Council,
Thursday, December 3, 2020
|
We are looking forward to continuing the work of the Commercial Program Work Group with the development of the NFRC 715 PCP Review and the Commercial Technical Task Groups. These groups are open to everyone. To join the groups, click on the name of the group below. To join the groups you must be logged into the community to join, so if you need to create a log it, click here. The details of the group are below: Scope: The task group is responsible for continuing with the development of the WG’s direction for a two-pathway (product directory path and project upload path) certification program and the maintaining of the NFRC 715 Product Certification Program document upon implementation. Staff Liaison- Kevin Louder Scope: The task group is responsible for continuing with the development of the WG’s direction for both the project upload path to certification and for the product directory path which utilizes a modified LEAFF methodology for generating U-Factor, SHGC, VT, and CI rating. Group Chair: Greg McKenna Staff Liaison: Kevin Louder We will be sending out a doodle poll on December 14th to schedule the first meeting in the new year. To make sure that you can make the first meeting, please join the group by Friday, December 11, 2020. This is open to everyone, but highly recommend for those who would like to be involved in the New Commercial Program. Save the Date: In the new year, we will be hosting a Technical Commercial webinar that will review the two-pathways to certification for commercial fenestration with specific focus on the new Commercial Trendline Approach (CTA) Method. This webinar is further being hosted to provide to a brief general overview of the status of the new commercial program, how the ratings are generated and what users should expect from the new program. If you have any questions about the group, please email Kevin Louder.
Tags:
commercial program
fenestration
NFRC ratings
task groups
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Adriana Vargas, National Fenestration Rating Council,
Tuesday, November 24, 2020
|
In his free time, NFRC’s board treasurer Greg McKenna sails, water skis, and paddle boards on the lake near his home in Georgia. When not out enjoying the water, McKenna is the Director, Field Engineering and Customer Training for Kawneer, Inc., which manufactures curtain wall, storefront, and other architectural fenestration systems for commercial buildings. He has been involved with NFRC since 1992 when NFRC began developing its commercial rating program. He first joined the NFRC board in 2016 and before then was involved in task groups and committees focused on the commercial rating system. In his third year on the Executive Committee and first year as treasurer, McKenna says he hopes to help improve the commercial rating program to become a user-friendly tool for architects and glazing contractors. McKenna wants it to be a source of information for design-build professionals to use to make informed choices on fenestration products for their buildings and to create a label certificate when required to show compliance to the energy code of the particular community. In this profile interview, we ask McKenna how his membership and involvement with NFRC has helped him professionally and he shared some insights into the growth and evolution of the organization over his more than 28 years of involvement. What do you see as some of the biggest changes with NFRC? There have been several positive changes within NFRC in the last few years. The Board of Directors is now more diverse than in years past. We are trying to recruit new board members who can fill gaps in experience or knowledge. Having differing perspectives on an issue will ultimately lead to better decisions. I have had the opportunity to meet many very talented and dedicated individuals who have a passion for the work of NFRC. NFRC is a great venue to network and develop many long-lasting business relationships. How has the industry evolved in that same time? Awareness of the benefits of thermal performance, especially in commercial construction, has accelerated over the last couple of decades. Originally, thermal performance was only about what you could see. If you did not have condensation on your windows, the fenestration product was doing its job. More recently, it is all about what you don’t see, such as, “how much energy savings will I see if I improve the U factor or SHGC?” Codes have also moved the industry to improve the thermal performance of fenestration products. Now above code programs, such as LEED V4 for commercial or ENERGY STAR® for residential, push the performance even further. What lessons have you learned from being involved in NFRC that you would share with young professionals just getting started in the fenestration industry? Get involved. Participate in task groups that interest you. You can learn a lot from the individuals who have been in the business a long time. Sometimes the veterans don’t always see the need for change or improvement. Don’t be afraid to challenge the status quo and speak up if you have a better idea. How would you describe NFRC to someone who doesn’t know about the organization? I would say NFRC’s main function has been to rate the energy-related characteristics of fenestration products (such as windows) in a fair, accurate, and credible manner so the consumer of these products can select the proper product for the application. NFRC’s rating system can answer questions like, “what is the thermal transmission, the solar heat gain, and the visible light transmission through a window?” Where do you think the fenestration industry will be in 10 years? 20 years? The commercial fenestration industry continues to evolve with 3D modeling of buildings is becoming more widely used. These models contain bills of material and fabrication details of the fenestration. Updates will be handled parametrically and checks for interference with other trades can be performed. Ultimately this will lead to more collaborative design and advanced manufacturing systems. Where will NFRC be during that same time? NFRC will need to keep pace with the technology. Thermal performance will someday be determined on exactly what is being built and not just on a standardized size used for product comparison. Designers and engineers want to know how their building is going to perform in real world conditions in real time using actual models of the fenestration system. They also may want to look at several different design scenarios. NFRC will need to adapt to the new technology in the future to ensure that NFRC remains relevant for years to come If you could do anything now (outside your current profession or role), what would you do? I have about 20 years of home improvement projects waiting for me in my spare time and several old cars, including a ’57 Chevy, that I need to restore.

Tags:
board of directors
committee
construction
energy performance
engineering
fenestration
members
SHGC
U-factor
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Adriana Vargas, National Fenestration Rating Council,
Wednesday, October 28, 2020
|
Research and Technology Committee Report Technical Committee Report Kevin Vilhauer of Katerra, has taken on the role of Vice Chair of the Technical Committee. The Condensation Index software tool will go through the Software Approval process. This software will assist simulators with obtaining temperatures from THERM for use with the CI rating.
By the end of the year, NFRC program documents, such as the NFRC 701, 702, etc., shall be approved as 2021 documents. All 2021 program documents shall be published in January of 2021.
ANS Standards Committee Report
Tags:
ANSI
committee
conference
energy efficiency
fenestration
meetings
report
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Adriana Vargas, National Fenestration Rating Council,
Tuesday, October 13, 2020
|
By Michelle Blackston
NFRC was
proud
to host
a three-part
webinar series, Building a Sustainable
Future
: Macro to Micro. We kicked
of
f
the series with
a
macro look at future weather patterns and predictions, then brought it down to the ground level to examine
how the built environment is responding to climate change,
and finished the series with
a micro
look
at innovations in solar glass.
All sessions were recorded and are available anytime on
NFRC’s YouTube page
.
Stream at your
convenience and
share these links
with colleagues.
Future Weather File
s
was presented by
Tom Di Liberto, a climatologist
and science writer with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Climate Program Office’s Communication team
.
Di
Liberto
gave
an in-depth look at future weather
patterns, changing climate zones, and what models predict from now until 2100. Learn about the tools and resources on Climate.gov to follow climate trends and changes.
George Mason University: Path to Net-Zero 2050 or Sooner!
showed how in
2007, George Mason University signed the
American College and University President’s Climate Commitment
to reach carbon neutrality by 2050 and then created the school’s Office of Sustainability.
Greg Farley, director of
University Sustainability at GMU,
shared
an overview of their Climate Action Plan and how the
campus is reducing
its carbon footprint
through the built environment.
Envisioning the Solar Glass Revolution
was presented by
Lance Wheeler, Ph.D.,
who leads research at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory
.
Wheeler
discussed
his invention of the world’s first thermochromic photovoltaic window.
He also
share
d
energy insights
and
current state
-
of
-
the
-
art cutting-edge innovations in PV technology and its use in windows.
Expand your r
each and support NFRC’s sustainability efforts
NFRC is excited to announce
2021
Sustainability Sponsorship Opportunities
to support
our sustainability efforts all year
long.
Demonstrate your commitment to sustainability while reaching NFRC’s growing network of stakeholders across the fenestration industry.
Support
educational sessions
such as
the Building a Sustainable Future webinar series
,
and
increased access to tools and resources for consumers
and industry professionals.
Learn more about opportunities and benefits of sponsorship by contacting
NFRC’s
Sustainability
Manager Jeremy Browning at
jbrowning@nfrc.org
.

Tags:
carbon emissions
carbon footprint
climate change
climate zones
energy efficiency
glass
green building
Net-Zero
NFRC ratings
renewable energy
sponsorship
sustainability
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Adriana Vargas, National Fenestration Rating Council,
Monday, August 31, 2020
|
By Jessica Finn
“If you don’t create a system for testing and reporting fair, accurate, and credible energy performance information for windows, doors, and skylights, we will.”
-U.S. Federal government
In 1989, 25 industry leaders attending an
American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers
(ASHRAE)
meeting in Vancouver,
got together to
discuss the need
to
establish a new organization focused on a national, uniform fenestration energy
-rating system. Since there was no official meeting space available in the hotel, the group eventually settled in the hotel bar. It was in this humble setting that
the National Fenestration Rating Council (
NFRC) was born, and its original logo sketched out on a bar napkin. By unanimous vote,
these pioneers agreed to form the
NFRC we know today.
The dedication of NFRC members mattered then, and 31 years later, membership matters just as much, if not more
today. We are facing new challenges that need to be address
ed as an organization and as an industry, including helping designers meet increasingly stringent energy codes, a changing
global climate that requires higher performance from fenestration products, and the need
to harmonize
international standards.
In the early years, no matter how much NFRC
members
disagreed, everyone knew that the forces that
brought them together still
existed. If they couldn’t
agree on
setting energy-performance standards, the federal government would
do it for them with its own system.
Another risk was states opt
ing
to set
their own standard,
potentially
adding onerous
delays and
expense to product testing and certification.
The challenges ahead of us are big, but the opportunities
for advancement and innovation are bigger
. NFRC staff works diligently to
increase
the organization’s capacity to meet these challenges head on. I
t’s
also important to highlight the
contributions of members
for past milestones, as well as the
positive effect they
have on the future of NFRC.
NFRC members have been instrumental in leading
and implementing:
-
Testing of the whole product v
s. center of glass testing,
-
NFRC becoming the recognized administrator of the
ENERGY STAR®
for fenestration
products,
-
One
-
size testing,
-
Condensation Index rating, and
-
LEAFF, among others.
NFRC welcomes members from across the industry, including manufacturers and suppliers, laboratories, inspection agencies, education and research institutions, not
-for-
profit organizations, and industry associations.
Every member matters! Small or large manufacturer
, university or laboratory, architect or retailer, your time and expertise can make a difference for you and the industry
. Leading up to our 2020 membership meeting, we are launching a membership campaign to bring on new members and recognize our current members.
We hope that you will join us to take on the challenges and seize
the opportunities that are coming our way. For more information, or to get involved click here.
Jessica Finn is NFRC’s membership manager and has been with the
organization for nine years.
Tags:
fenestration
industry
manufacturers
members
membership
NFRC ratings
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|